B-17 Vs B-29 - Aviation History Home Page Here's why the B-29 may have had higher losses than the B-17 and B-24 in Germany in 1943.
This is why the B-29 probably had higher losses than the B-17 and B-24 in Germany in 1943.
B-17 Vs B-29
The B-29 was primarily used in the Pacific theater during World War II, but how would it have fared in the German air war if it had been available in 1943?
Vaccins En Risico Op Kanker
Designed in 1940 as a later replacement for the B-17 and B-24, the first B-29 made its first flight in September. 21, 1942. In December 1943U.S. The leadership of the Air Force Air Force is dedicated to the Asian Superfortress, where its large size is especially suitable for long-haul flights against the Japanese homeland from bases in China. During the last two months of 1944, B-29s began operating against Japan on the islands of Saipan, Guam and Tinian.
So, the B-29 was primarily used in the Pacific theater during World War II, but how would it have fared in the German air war if it had been used in 1943?
"The short answer is that I don't think it was very effective in 1943, and it really would have been a death trap in Europe, with more losses than a B-17 or a B-24," said Willard Foxton, Aviation Expert. and made several documentaries about World War II, explained on Quora.
"Here is a hard fact - the B-29, while a revolutionary aircraft, was not a very good aircraft as it was first deployed, and these problems were definitely present in the version deployed to Britain in 1943.
What Made The B 29 Superfortress Such An Important Aircraft During World War Ii?
Curtis LeMay - commander of the Superfortress - said "There are many defects - easily visible - or worse - that show when the aircraft is in operation and at altitude".
"The Superfortress is very expensive - its development cost a billion more than the atomic bomb - and it is crowded with many advanced systems, all the latest technology, which are few and fully functional.
"More of the top ones were lost to mechanical failure than to any cause; in the first 6 months, always 10% of the bombers were lost - on mission - to mechanical failure alone. .
In particular, the R3350 engines - while impressive on paper, and the most powerful to be installed on a WWII bomber - were not reliable throughout the war, especially when the fortress was first deployed.
Revell 1/48 B 24d
Engine fires and overheating are common due to the "double-double" cylinder configuration, which often results in engine temperatures of up to 300 degrees; it would be manageable if it weren't for the engine's special construction equipment.
'To save weight the R3350 has a magnesium case. You may know by now - this is the last example of magnesium used in aircraft engine manufacturing, for some reason!
"Although magnesium is light and very strong, it is very flammable, and once ignited, it is impossible to put out. In 87% of engine fires, the extinguisher cannot handle it, and the fire burns all over. engine and wings. The statistics of losses speak for themselves - 414 B-29 losses in WWII, 147 of them were lost and Japanese fighters, 267 were on fire.
"Of course, the fire is a spectacular sight to behold - magnesium burns so hot at a temperature of 5,600°F (3,100°C) - so intense that the largest wingtip can burn in seconds, resulting in .severe failure.
Steam Community :: Gids :: Aircraft Bullets And A Comprehensive Guide To Everything Else
'Magnesium is also surprisingly fragile; Reports often say that the engines are shaking and shaking on the runway, unable to handle the damage.
The biggest losses were early in the bombing campaign against Japan, when B-29s were flying in from China; The problems were eventually fixed, but mostly because of the change in beliefs that flew slowly and low.
Defense room is another problem for the European team B29; The B29 is equipped with a modern armament of 4 remote-controlled guns, and a tail turret with a 20mm cannon. Connected to 5 networked computer monitors, the shooters, in theory, can shoot with amazing accuracy, and even control multiple winds at once.
'It's nice, isn't it? But the problem is that the system doesn't work at all. It repeatedly failed to repel Japanese fighters and was completely plagued by technical and mechanical deficiencies.
Comunitate Steam :: Ghid :: Biggest Planes In War Thunder
Especially the front guns - doubled from 2 to 4 to prevent frontal attacks - have poor ballistics to facilitate automatic, leaving the 4-gun turret where it is impossible to hit a target with more than two guns, with a big blind spot in the attack head.
CFC 200lb computers suffer from poor construction and rarely perform as advertised - a common fault is to kill the membrane at 20 degrees and then spray it with a full load of lead. This defect - due to poor cable design - was only discovered in January 1945, when the Superfortress had been in operation for seven months.
A later modification enabled you to position the vanes to follow the movement - a good condition in terms of, until the attacks on Japan 17 bombers were loaded with ammunition - the bomb doors opened. causing other bombs to form direct fire.
It's also impossible to access the turrets in flight - so any malfunctions or jams are bad in the air. The impressive tail - with a 20mm cannon - was hampered by the poor ballistic design so that both the machine gun and the cannon could not hit the same target, the radar guiding the tail cannon never worked. war (eventually the tail cannon and radar were removed, and the twin .50 rags remained).
B 17 Sally B Hi Res Stock Photography And Images
At the end of the defense system was not satisfied that it was removed from all the aircraft in February 1945 (bar turret tail), and the B-29B was built without any turrets, as the USAAF realized the defense guns on explosion. - even the most advanced defensive guns - are of little use at high altitude and speed and at night.
"In 1943, the USAAF adopted a bad idea - developing self-defense bombers to target targets without daylight protection."
If the B-29 had been deployed in 1943, it would have been deployed like this, and I suspect that despite the speed and altitude advantages, it would have been killed by some kind of destruction, the depression in the depth of the attack. in Schweinfurt / Ploesti mold. (to be fair, like all other attempts to fly self-defense against attackers hundreds of miles from defended targets).
"The B-29 - a revolutionary aircraft - also had a great problem with the training of the crew. There are no experienced instructors, because the experience of the type and the conditions in which it is flown is really non-existent and the end of human experience - members many workers who pass the test to fly are actually very poor. This problem was so serious that even the tough Le May stopped the entire force of the B-29 in the Pacific to retrain for several months.
B 17 Flying Fortress Bomber And B 29 Superfortress Bomber In Flight Together During A Test Conducted By Boeing, Circa Late 1944.
"Part of the failure of the crew training was that the atmospheric conditions were also against the B-29 to be flown as originally thought. The American doctrine is to do the flying and bombing properly, that's how the first crew was trained.
"The B-29s flew at high enough altitudes that a new phenomenon—140 mph high-level winds, which we now know as the "jet stream"—created an almost impossible-to-achieve formation that could destroy the air defense boxes. . . . So not only was basic American flight training out of date, but crucially—unbeknownst to its first deployment—the accuracy of the B-29 bomber when it was first deployed was The bombs were dropped in 100 mph+ winds at high altitudes with unpredictable results, rendering the Norden bomb - the core of the USAAF's precision bombing doctrine - completely useless.
'In 1944, 1 in 3 B-29s hit RAF standards, ie within 5 miles of the target. Daylight, clear vision. The truth is that it takes a lot of painful experience to realize that the prescribed height of the faith bomb of 27-30,000 feet is impossible.
"More than this, the B-29 in this anti-aircraft operation in 1943 provided a unique and exciting opportunity for the Allied commanders. Sure, you could deploy alongside the B-17 and B-24, but you would be sacrificing the advantages. the amazing technology that the B-29 brings.
Plane Of The Week: Boeing B 17
Although the B-29 had significant advantages over the B-17 and B-24, they were not as vulnerable to German fighters, especially in the forward configuration of full guns. It went 50 miles per hour faster than the B-17, and flew at 25-30,000 feet. It's only when you remove the throttle that it starts to climb above 35,000 feet where fighters are at a disadvantage.
In late September 1944, when Colonel Paul Tibbets suggested that the B-29's wings be higher and thus safer,
Jeremiah 29 11 17, proverbs 29 17, 17 black 29 red, genesis 29 17, 17 29, 17 x 29 frame, 29 17 baseball bat, acts 17 29 31, easton mako 29 17, gen 29 17, acts 17 24 29, 29 x 17 tv
0 Comments